maxs science article [from wikipedia]

Jump to: navigation, search
For other uses, see Chameleon (disambiguation).
Chameleon
Bradypodion pumilum Cape chameleon female
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Order: Squamata
Suborder: Lacertilia
Infraorder: Iguania
Family: Chamaeleonidae
Subfamilies and Genera

Chameleons (family Chamaeleonidae) are a distinctive and highly specialized clade of lizards. They are distinguished by their zygodactylous feet, their separately mobile and stereoscopic eyes, their very long, highly modified, and rapidly extrudable tongues, their swaying gait, the possession by many of a prehensile tail, crests or horns on their distinctively shaped heads, and the ability of some to change color. Colors include pink, blue, red, orange, turquoise, yellow, green, brown, and black. Uniquely adapted for climbing and visual hunting, the approximately 160 species of chameleon range from Africa, Madagascar, Spain and Portugal, across south Asia, to Sri Lanka, have been introduced to Hawaii, California, and Florida, and are found in warm habitats that vary from rain forest to desert conditions. Chameleons are often kept as household pets.

Contents

Etymology

The English word chameleon (also chamaeleon) derives from Latin chamaeleō, a borrowing of the Ancient Greek χαμαιλέων (khamailéōn), a compound of χαμαί (khamaí) “on the ground” and λέων (léōn) “lion”. The Greek word is a calque translating the Akkadian nēš qaqqari, literally ‘lion ground’ (adjectives follow nouns in Akkadian).[1]

Classification

Family Chamaeleonidae

Evolution

The oldest known chameleon is Anqingosaurus brevicephalus from the Middle Paleocene (about 58.7–61.7 mya) of China.[2]

Other chameleon fossils include Chamaeleo caroliquarti from the Lower Miocene (about 13–23 mya) of the Czech Republic and Germany, and Chamaeleo intermedius from the Upper Miocene (about 5–13 mya) of Kenya.[2]

The chameleons are probably far older than that, perhaps sharing a common ancestor with iguanids and agamids more than 100 mya (agamids being more closely related). Since fossils have been found in Africa, Europe and Asia, chameleons were certainly once more widespread than they are today. Although nearly half of all chameleon species today are found in Madagascar, this offers no basis for speculation that chameleons might originate from there.[3] Monophyly of the family is supported by several studies.[citation needed]

Stefan’s science question

How did the first plants come to be?

Stefan’s Article (How did the first plants come to be?)

 

Not all plants use seeds. Plants use more than one method of reproduction. The first life forms on Earth were photosynthetic. They used light from the sun to make sugar, and then consumed the sug

 

Ask or Answer a Question to Join our Community.

 

How did the first plant come to be?

franklinfranklin
ajax Loading stats…
 
ajax Loading awards…
 
Sign in and you can:  Private message
 Become a friend  Follow

 
 
 
Scientifically, how did the first plant be created. It need a seed and parents DNA so how could it “re-“produce and come to be? This has been bugging me for days and I really want to know.
 More search results: how did the first plant come to be
Asked by franklin 53 months ago
 
 
 
Similar Questions: plant
Recent Questions About: plant
 

Sponsored Links

 
<a title=”www.ask.com/The+Plant” href=”http://www.google.com/aclk?sa=L&ai=CjojK4px3UKGmIYqa6wHn64HwDo_UieECv6LP21awuKeGXBABIJ2P5xYoBVCejJSr-_____8BYP2Q9YDMA8gBAaoEJE_QbIYNrp2zw9clgjaZjcXFYbcPIzeRasB6v23K5hrduMlpNA&num=1&sig=AOD64_1guNdFsst37PEh2u9LCnQ4Bwl1GQ&adurl=http://www.ask.com/slp%3F%26q%3Dthe%2Bplant%26sid%3D65c24e15-1ad5-48f2-8aa8-a18365bf1ed8-0-us_gsb%26kwid%3D%252Bthe%2520%252Bplant%26cid%3D23192827519%26site%3D” rel=”nofollow” target=”_new”>The Plant
Search for The Plant.
Find Answers on Ask.com.
   
 
Low Prices and Same Day Delivery.
Secure ordering, 100% guarantee
   
 
<a title=”www.info.com/EarlyPlant” href=”http://www.google.com/aclk?sa=L&ai=CVQgV4px3UKGmIYqa6wHn64HwDv3u3esD7bXCmFmmu6CgKhADIJ2P5xYoBVCu7bjsAmD9kPWAzAPIAQGqBCdP0GyXBq6fs8PXJco2Z_dEUAFsf_qiFetxAbuqbmMa2C-T8taRlKE&num=3&sig=AOD64_0-eIdvlh04Y72vWkMDC0vE1Sw08A&adurl=http://www.info.com/Early%2520Plant%3Fcb%3D27%26cmp%3D316767″ rel=”nofollow” target=”_new”>Early Plant Info
Get Info On Early Plant.
Access 10 Search Engines At Once.
   
 
Get Great Gardening Tips and Share
Ideas with your Fellow Gardeners!
   
 
Professional Wetland Scientist
County Qualified Wetland Specialist
   
Answers
 

Answer from Manimal
5 people found this helpful

That is one of the mysteries of evolution.

Not all plants use seeds. Plants use more than one method of reproduction. The first life forms on Earth were photosynthetic. They used light from the sun to make sugar, and then consumed the sugar to reproduce. The leap from single cell organisms to multi cell organisms is unknown, and there are many theories. 

I think the plants you refer to have roots and leaves and reproductive organs that produce seeds. Evolution states that these plants evolved from simpler plants, but nobody knows the exact evolutionary path from single cells, to plants without seeds, to plants with seeds. The link below gives a lot more data about each phase.

 

I hope this helps.

 

 

Sources: http://www.emc.maricopa.edu/faculty/farabee/BIOBK/BioBookDiversity_5.html
Please sign in to give a compliment.
Please verify your account to give a compliment.
Please sign in to send a message.
Please verify your account to send a message.
 
 
 
ManimalManimal
ajax Loading stats…
 
ajax Loading awards…
 
Sign in and you can:  Private message
 Become a friend  Follow

 

Answer from PamPerdue
4 people found this helpful

The first plants didn’t have seeds

“Plants” is a pretty broad term covering a wide range of organisms, not all of which reproduce sexually.The simplest plants are single-celled green algae.  They don’t have separate seeds; they’re just a single cell.  Some algae have just a single set of chromosomes; others chromosome pairs.  You get double chromosomes when two algae merge, giving you a unique organism that can the reproduce.  Sometimes it will reproduce by simple fission, giving you two new organisms with unique single-chromosome genomes.

The history of plants goes from single-celled algae to simple clusters of algae (with different genomes) to multicellular algae with a single genome but different cells performing different tasks called Charophytes.  They spawn special cells with half genomes (like our own sperm and egg cells) that go out and find other gametes from other charophytes, but they don’t distinguish separate male and female genders. 

You can think of these as alternating between half-genome generations (“haploid”) and full-genone generations (“diploid”).  Looked at that broadly, animals do the same thing: you give rise to a generation of haploid cells (sperm or eggs) that merge with somebody else’s next generation to form the subsequent generation of diploid humans.  It’s only our conceit that makes the human generations more important than the haploid generations; as far as the sperm and egg are concerned, humans are just ways to make more sperms and eggs.

Actual seeds and pollen came even later, with the seed plants called “spermatophytes”.  That involved several different evolutionary steps, but it started with the charophytes developing specialized male and female gametes.  Later, after the development of the other characteristics of true plants (embryophytes). 

The embroyphytes are actually relatively recent; they evolved on land rather than in the sea. There are some aquatic embryophytes, but in fact they’ve moved into the sea from land rather than the other way around. They have specialized sex organs, unlike the charophytes, but they don’t have separate egg and pollen cells.

That was yet another evolutionary step, the spermatophytes, which is what you think of when you say “plant”.  That happened when some of the plant’s reproductive system (the rest of the organs) began to encase the fertilized seeds for greater durability, enabling them to spread a lot further inland.  They conquered the world.

That’s why you think of them as “plants”, even though there are so many plants without seeds.  The charophytes had other descendants that don’t produce seeds, like ferns and mosses.  These may actually have derived from the seed plants.  Tracing down the evolutionary path is best done with gene sequencing, and while they’re sequencing things as fast as they can it’s still an expensive and time-consuming process.

The upshot is that no, “seeds” didn’t just mysteriously appear one day.  The evolutionary history of plants is long and complicated, with a lot of side journeys and dead ends along the way.  I’ve only barely touched on it, what you’d find in any introductory biology textbook.  There’s a lot more to know about it, but I’ve let this answer go on long enough.

 

Please sign in to give a compliment.
Please verify your account to give a compliment.
Please sign in to send a message.
Please verify your account to send a message.
 
 
 
PamPerduePamPerdue
ajax Loading stats…
 
ajax Loading awards…
 
Sign in and you can:  Private message
 Become a friend  Follow

 

Answer from Ancient_Hacker
4 people found this helpful

Well…

Well first you have to define “Plant”.   Let’s go with a living thing that uses chlorophyll to capture energy.The first “plants” did not look like your average Dandelion.  They were probably derived from blue-green algea,  which are very very very old.  Eventually they added more of the chlorophyll and depended more on sunlight.  Then they stumbled on the idea that  it was beneficial to stick together into larger and larger groups, like colonies.  Eventually some specialized into stronger cells for plant strength, others specialized into root hairs to get more water.  Up to here they’ve been reproducing asexually-by splitting or budding.   Eventually they stumbled upon sequestering the DNA into certain cells and spilling those around.  Some even found an advantage into splitting the genetic material into two parts, that was the invention of sex!

 

Please sign in to give a compliment.
Please verify your account to give a compliment.
Please sign in to send a message.
Please verify your account to send a message.

ar to reproduce. The leap from single cell organisms to multi cell organisms is unknown, and there are many theories.

 

 

 

I think the plants you refer to have roots and leaves and reproductive organs that produce seeds. Evolution states that these plants evolved from simpler plants, but nobody knows the exact evolutionary path from single cells, to plants without seeds, to plants with seeds. The link below gives a lot more data about each phase.

 

 

 

I hope this helps

 

Isabella’s artical

Please read:
a personal appeal from
Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales
Read now
Close

Monkey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For other uses, see Monkey (disambiguation).
Page semi-protected

A Crab-eating Macaque, an old world species of monkey native to Southeast Asia

A monkey is a primate of the Haplorrhini suborder and simian infraorder, either an Old World monkey or a New World monkey, but excluding apes. There are about 260 known living species of monkey. Many are arboreal, although there are species that live primarily on the ground, such as baboons. Monkeys are generally considered to be intelligent. Unlike apes, monkeys usually have tails. Tailless monkeys may be called “apes”, incorrectly according to modern usage; thus the tailless Barbary macaque is called the “Barbary ape”.

The New World monkeys (superfamily Ceboidea) are classified within the parvorder of Platyrrhini, whereas the Old World monkeys (superfamily Cercopithecoidea) form part of the parvorder Catarrhini, which also includes the hominoids (apes, including humans). Thus, as Old World monkeys are more closely related to hominoids than they are to New World monkeys, the monkeys are not a unitary (monophyletic) group.

Contents

Historical and modern terminology

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the word “monkey” may originate in a German version of the Reynard the Fox fable, published circa 1580. In this version of the fable, a character named Moneke is the son of Martin the Ape.[1] In English, no very clear distinction was originally made between “ape” and “monkey”; thus the 1910 Encyclopædia Britannica entry for “ape” notes that it is either a synonym for “monkey” or is used to mean a tailless humanlike primate.[2] Such confusions persist. Colloquially, the terms “monkeys” and “apes” may still be used interchangeably.[3] Due to its size (up to 1 m/3 ft) the mandrill is often thought to be an ape, but it is actually an Old World monkey. Also, a few monkey species have the word “ape” in their common name, such as the Barbary ape.

Later in the first half of the 20th century, the idea developed that there were trends in primate evolution and that the living members of the order could be arranged in a series, leading through “monkeys” and “apes” to humans.[4] Monkeys thus constituted a “grade” on the path to humans and were distinguished from “apes”.[5]

Scientific classifications are now more often based on monophyletic groups, that is groups consisting of all the descendants of a common ancestor. The New World monkeys and the Old World monkeys are each monophyletic groups, but their combination is not, since it excludes hominoids (apes and humans). Thus the term “monkey” no longer refers to a recognized scientific taxon. The smallest accepted taxon which contains all the monkeys is the infraorder Simiiformes, or simians. However this also contains the hominoids (apes and humans), so that monkeys are, in terms of currently recognized taxa, non-hominoid simians.

A group of monkeys may be referred to as a mission or a tribe.

Physical description

Monkeys range in size from the Pygmy Marmoset, at 140 to 160 millimetres (5–6 in) long (plus tail) and 120 to 140 grams (4–5 oz) in weight, to the male Mandrill, almost 1 metre (3.3 ft) long and weighing 35 kilograms (77 lb). Some are arboreal (living in trees) while others live on the savanna; diets differ among the various species but may contain any of the following: fruit, leaves, seeds, nuts, flowers, eggs and small animals (including insects and spiders).

Some characteristics are shared among the groups; most New World monkeys have prehensile tails while Old World monkeys have non-prehensile tails or no visible tail at all. Some have trichromatic color vision like that of humans, others are dichromats or monochromats. Although both the New and Old World monkeys, like the apes, have forward-facing eyes, the faces of Old World and New World monkeys look very different, though again, each group shares some features such as the types of noses, cheeks and rumps.

Classification

Monkeys (in green brackets) are not a monophyletic group, since they exclude hominoids.

The following list shows where the various monkey families (bolded) are placed in the classification of living (extant) primates.

Relationship with humans

The many species of monkey have varied relationships with humans. Some are kept as pets, others used as model organisms in laboratories or in space missions. They may be killed in monkey drives when they threatened agriculture, or used as service animals for the disabled.

In some areas, some species of monkey are considered agricultural pests, and can cause extensive damage to commercial and subsistence crops.[6] This can have important implications for the conservation of endangered species, which may be subject to persecution. In some instances farmers’ perceptions of the damage may exceed the actual damage.[7] Monkeys that have become habituated to human presence in tourist locations may also be considered pests, attacking tourists.[8]

In religion and culture, the monkey often represents quick-wittedness and mischief.

As service animals for the disabled

Some organizations, for example Helping Hands: Monkey Helpers for the Disabled,[9] train capuchin monkeys as monkey helpers to assist quadriplegics and other people with severe spinal cord injuries or mobility impairments. After being socialized in a human home as infants, the monkeys undergo extensive training before being placed with a quadriplegic. Around the house, the monkeys help out by doing tasks including microwaving food, washing the quadriplegic’s face and opening drink bottles.

In experiments

Covance primate-testing lab, Vienna, Virginia, 2004–05[10]

Macaques, especially the Rhesus Macaque, and African Green Monkeys are widely used in animal testing facilities, either wild-caught or purpose-bred.[11] They are used primarily because of their relative ease of handling, their fast reproductive cycle (compared to apes) and their psychological and physical similarity to humans. In the United States, around 50,000 non-human primates, most of them monkeys, have been used in experiments every year since 1973; 10,000 monkeys were used in the European Union in 2004.[citation needed]

Sam, a rhesus macaque, was flown to a height of 55 miles (89 km) by NASA in 1959

The use of monkeys in laboratories is controversial. Animal rights activists claim that their use is cruel and produces little information of value, and there have been many protests, vandalism to testing facilities and threats to workers.[citation needed] Others claim that it has led to many important medical breakthroughs such as the rabies vaccine, understanding of human reproduction and basic knowledge about brain function and that the prevention of harm to humans should be a higher priority than the possible harm done to monkeys. The topic has become a popular cause for animal rights and animal welfare groups.[citation needed]

In space

A number of countries have used monkeys as part of their space exploration programmes, including the United States and France. The first monkey in space was Albert II who flew in the US-launched V-2 rocket on June 14, 1949.

As food

Monkey brains are eaten as a delicacy in parts of South Asia, Africa and China.[12] In traditional Islamic dietary laws, the eating of monkeys is forbidden. However, monkeys are sometimes eaten in parts of Africa, where they can be sold as “bushmeat“.[13]

Literature

Illustration of Hindustan monkeys called bandar that can be taught to do tricks, from Illuminated manuscript Baburnama (Memoirs of Babur)

Sun Wukong (the “Monkey King”), a character who figures prominently in Chinese mythology, is the main protagonist in the classic comic Chinese novel Journey to the West.

Monkeys are prevalent in numerous books, television programs, and movies. The television series Monkey and the literary characters Monsieur Eek and Curious George are all examples.

Simian statue at a Buddhist shrine in Tokyo, Japan

Informally, the term “monkey” is often used more broadly than in scientific use, and may be used to refer to apes, particularly chimpanzees, gibbons, and gorillas. Author Terry Pratchett alludes to this difference in usage in his Discworld novels, in which the Librarian of the Unseen University is an orangutan who gets very violent if referred to as a monkey.

The Winged monkeys are prominent characters in The Wizard of Oz.

Religion and worship

Hanuman, a prominent divine entity in Hinduism, is a monkey-like humanoid. He may bestow longevity.

In Buddhism, the monkey is an early incarnation of Buddha but may also represent trickery and ugliness. The Chinese Buddhistmind monkey” metaphor refers to the unsettled, restless state of human mind. Monkey is also one of the Three Senseless Creatures, symbolizing greed, with the tiger representing anger and the deer lovesickness.

The Mizaru or three wise monkeys are revered in Japanese folklore.[14]

The Moche people of ancient Peru worshipped nature.[15] They placed emphasis on animals and often depicted monkeys in their art.[16]

Entertainment

Globe icon.

Zodiac

The Monkey is the ninth in the twelve-year cycle of animals which appear in the Chinese zodiac related to the Chinese calendar. The next time that the monkey will appear as the zodiac sign will be in the year 2016.[17]

See also

References

  1. ^ “Monkey”.
  2. ^ Anon. (1911), “Ape”, Encyclopædia Britannica, XIX (11th ed.), New York: Encyclopædia Britannica, retrieved 2011-07-10
  3. ^ Webster’s New World College Dictionary, 4th Ed: Monkey
  4. ^ Dixson, A.F. (1981), The Natural History of the Gorilla, London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, ISBN 978-0-297-77895-0, p. 13
  5. ^ “How do Apes Differ From Monkeys”.
  6. ^ Hill, Catherine (2000). “Conflict of Interest Between People and Baboons: Crop Raiding in Uganda”. International Journal of Primatology 21 (2): 299–315. doi:10.1023/A:1005481605637.
  7. ^ Siex, Kirsten; Thomas T. Struhsaker (1999). “Colobus Monkeys and Coconuts: A Study of Perceived Human-Wildlife Conflicts”. Journal of Applied Ecology 36 (6): 1009–1020. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00455.x.
  8. ^ Brennan, E; Else, J; Altmann, J (1985). “Ecology and behaviour of a pest primate: vervet monkeys in a tourist-lodge habitat”. African Journal of Ecology 23 (1): 35–44. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.1985.tb00710.x.
  9. ^ http://www.monkeyhelpers.org/
  10. ^ “Covance Cruelty”, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.
  11. ^ “The supply and use of primates in the EU”, European Biomedical Research Association.
  12. ^ Bonné, J. (2005-10-28). “Some bravery as a side dish”. msnbc.com. Retrieved 2009-08-15.
  13. ^ Institut De Recherche Pour Le Développement (2002). “Primate Bushmeat : Populations Exposed To Simian Immunodeficiency Viruses”. ScienceDaily. Retrieved 2009-08-15.
  14. ^ Cooper, J. C. (1992). Symbolic and Mythological Animals. London: Aquarian Press. pp. 161–63. ISBN 1-85538-118-4.
  15. ^ Benson, E. (1972). The Mochica: A Culture of Peru. New York: Praeger Press. ISBN 978-0-500-72001-1.
  16. ^ Berrin, K. & Museo Arqueológico Rafael Larco Herrera (1997). The Spirit of Ancient Peru: Treasures from the Museo Arqueológico Rafael Larco Herrera. New York: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 978-0-500-01802-6.
  17. ^ “Primatestore zodiac signs”.

External links

1 cool fact about moss.

did you know that moss has tiny roots (that are poorly structured) called Rhizoids which allows moss to grow in places other plants can’t for example; rocks, trees, clay and etc. please comment if helped with project

isobel’s science question

“how long does it take for moss to grow and what would happen if you added water, vinagar or salt to it ?” this links to plantae kingdom

Alex’s Science Inquiry Question

Why do Pit Bull jaws lock and other dogs jaws don’t?

Kailyn’s Article

http://www.whyzz.com/why-do-octopuses-and-squids-have-eight-arms

Tamara’s Science Question!

How did pygmy marmoset start of?

nolan science article [from Wikipedia]

Protists (play /ˈprtɨst/) are a diverse group of eukaryotic microorganisms. Historically, protists were treated as the kingdom Protista, which includes mostlyunicellular organisms that do not fit into the other kingdoms, but this group is contested in modern taxonomy.[1] Instead, it is “better regarded as a loose grouping of 30 or 40 disparate phyla with diverse combinations of trophic modes, mechanisms of motility, cell coverings and life cycles.”[2]

The protists do not have much in common besides a relatively simple organization[3]—either they are unicellular, or they are multicellular without specializedtissues. This simple cellular organization distinguishes the protists from other eukaryotes, such as fungianimals and plants.

The term protista was first used by Ernst Haeckel in 1866. Protists were traditionally subdivided into several groups based on similarities to the “higher” kingdoms: the unicellular “animal-like” protozoa, the “plant-like” protophyta (mostly unicellular algae), and the “fungus-like” slime molds and water molds. These traditional subdivisions, largely based on superficial commonalities, have been replaced by classifications based on phylogenetics (evolutionary relatedness among organisms). However, the older terms are still used as informal names to describe the morphology and ecology of various protists.

Protists live in almost any environment that contains liquid water. Many protists, such as the algae, are photosynthetic and are vital primary producers in ecosystems, particularly in the ocean as part of the plankton. Other protists, such as the Kinetoplastids and Apicomplexa, are responsible for a range of serious human diseases, such as malaria and sleeping sickness.