Category Archives: Uncategorized

Marla Spivak – Ted Talks/Bees are in trouble

Learn more about Cheerios Cereals troubled campaign to help bees survive.

Bee Campaign runs into trouble – what does science tell us?

Learn more about how biologist study animal movement and behaviour using observational data gained with tracking devices.

Project SnowStorm

The Invasive Species Council of BC is meeting with the goal of updating the invasive species approach.  Learn More…

“The ISCBC has already completed one in-depth input session that covered four solutions from the Strategy at the November 24th ISCBC Special Members Meeting. To keep building on the momentum and allow everyone ample opportunity to contribute, the ISCBC is offering three interactive Online Input Sessions. If you cannot attend the Input Sessions or have additional feedback beyond the facilitated discussions, we encourage you to fill out Online Input Forms accessed below. All input received from the November 24th ISCBC Special Members meeting, and gathered through online submissions, is listed in each of the Online Submission pages. Input from the online meetings will also be added to the running summaries.”

Quizlet on the Scientific Method:

Learn more about the scientific method and how popcorn is popped!

Welcome Back!
Best wishes for an exciting new year of learning!

Naughty or Nice – NORAD Santa Tracker

Is there a greater chance of species to species disease transfer when different animal species (birds and bats) share the same nest hole?

Learn more…Science in Action

Noctule Bats

Learn more about the MMR Vaccination scare:

Why did it take so long for the top medical journal is the UK, the Lancet, to withdraw an article by Dr. Wakefield?  Dr Wakefield, a bowel specialist,  suggested a link between MMR Vaccination and autism.  The original study was published in the Lancet in 1998.

Top five facts about the Lancet article and the Wakefield Study:

1. the Wakefield investigation could not be repeated.  A valid science study must be able to be repeated.
2. the study involved only 12 subjects.  While this might be fine if it was an early stage investigation, twelve is too small a sample to conclude that the MMR vaccination causes autism.  Twelve as a sample size is too small to be statistically valid.
3. Eight (8) of the 12 mothers in the study suggested that Autism developed 2 weeks after their child was vaccination.  In fact the test subjects were exhibiting autism traits 24 months before the MMR vaccination was given.
4. Dr. Wakefield contacted the 12 subjects two years before he did his investigation and recruited these families to participate in his “research”.  
5. Dr. Wakefield was paid by lawyers to promote the MMR Vaccination scare.

Learn more about vaccinations:

Vaccinations are not drugs – they are real chemicals.  Vaccinations stimulate an immune response.

Vaccinations are given to people who have no symptoms of a disease.